I often prefer to shoot in my home, or a client’s, or in other real-world environments instead of in a traditional photo studio. Don’t get me wrong—studios have their own set of advantages (and I do a lot of photography in studios). They offer a very controlled environment, which is perfect for precise lighting setups and consistent results.
Studios also provide a neutral meeting and working space in a professional environment. The high ceilings, the ability to play music (sometimes loudly), and accommodating more people without them milling about someone’s home are definite perks. Plus, studios often have gear that photographers might not own, making it easier to use high-end equipment without the hassle of transporting it.
But, shooting on location or at home comes with its own set of unique benefits:
Rich Environments: Real-world settings provide more than just a white cyc background or various colors of seamless paper. The natural elements, textures, and varied backgrounds in an environment can add depth and interest to your photos, making each shoot unique and visually interesting.
Comfort and Coziness: Shooting in a home or familiar environment can feel less “cold” and more cozy or comfortable. This relaxed atmosphere often helps subjects feel more at ease, resulting in more genuine and expressive portraits.
Privacy and Freedom: Without outside studio owners or employees around, you can work without interruptions or worries about privacy (think boudoir). There’s no need to schedule around other shoots or worry about time limits. This freedom allows for more spontaneous and creative sessions.
Cost-Effective: Let’s face it—renting studio space can get pricey. Shooting at home or on location is often much cheaper, saving you money that can be invested in other areas of your work.
So, both approaches have their merits, and I believe it’s all about finding what works best for you and your style. For me, the flexibility, warmth, and unique opportunities that come with home and on-location shoots are hard to beat.